<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patrick Rothfuss - Blog &#187; Goodreads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/category/goodreads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fanmail Q &amp; A: Coolness</title>
		<link>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2010/01/fanmail-q-coolness/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2010/01/fanmail-q-coolness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fanmail Q + A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felicia Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodreads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gaiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wil Wheaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I answered an e-mail from a reader. How about we do that?
Pat,
I just wanted to say I&#8217;ve loved The Name of the Wind for over a year now, but I just recently found your website. Your blog has kept me laughing for almost two solid weeks as I go back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I answered an e-mail from a reader. How about we do that?</p>
<blockquote style="font-style: italic;"><p>Pat,</p>
<p>I just wanted to say I&#8217;ve loved The Name of the Wind for over a year now, but I just recently found your website. Your blog has kept me laughing for almost two solid weeks as I go back and read the archives. That&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve never done with a blog before.</p>
<p>Even better, your fundraiser was seriously amazing this year.</p>
<p>Seriously, how cool are you?</p>
<p>Jake</p></blockquote>
<p>Jake,</p>
<p>You strike on a topic I&#8217;ve been curious about for some time. How cool am I?</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve <a href="http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/blog/2009/03/on-importance-of-treat-bringing.html">mentioned before in the blog</a>, growing up, I wasn&#8217;t one of the cool kids. But things change, and these days geek is chic. I&#8217;m willing to admit to the fact that these days, I might actually be a little cool.</p>
<p>Your letter poses an interesting problem though. If you&#8217;d simply asked, &#8220;Are you cool?&#8221; I could have gotten away with answering &#8220;maybe&#8221; or &#8220;kinda.&#8221; But you&#8217;ve asked for a _degree_ of coolness. What&#8217;s more, you&#8217;ve requested that I *seriously* consider the problem.</p>
<p>That means we need to use science and shit. We need quantifiable units of coolness that we can plug into formulas. We need to be rigorous.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, to the best of my knowledge, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Bureau_of_Weights_and_Measures">BIPM</a> hasn&#8217;t established a standard unit by which we can measure coolness. I can&#8217;t just tell you that I&#8217;m say, 85 pascals of cool. Or 158 newtons. Or whatever.</p>
<p>That means if we want to determine how cool I am, we have to measure me against some sort of universally accepted standard of cool. We need to develop our own yardstick, as it were.</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s pick two people who are undeniably cool. The king and queen of geek cool: Felicia Day and Neil Gaiman.</p>
<p>Now we need some numbers. While popularity isn&#8217;t quite the same thing as cool, you have to admit they&#8217;re closely related. Since I don&#8217;t have access to things like book sales or website hits, we&#8217;ll have to go to the lowest common denominator: Facebook.</p>
<p>(Yes, I know. Technically, Myspace would be the lowest common denominator. But there&#8217;s only so low I&#8217;m willing to go, even for science.)</p>
<p>A quick search of fan pages reveals the following stats.</p>
<p>Felicia: 192,000 fans.</p>
<p>Neil: 90,000 fans.</p>
<p>Me: 10,000 fans.</p>
<p>Now we could stop here and say, that I&#8217;m about .05 as cool as Felicia. Or that I&#8217;m roughly .11 of a Gaiman. Or something like that.</p>
<p>But drawing data from only one source strikes me as slipshod. To round things out, why don&#8217;t we take a look at Goodreads rankings?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a screenshot of their <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/user_followings/most_followed?country=US&amp;duration=a">list of most-followed people</a>.</p>
<p>[Edit: Yes, I know these numbers have changed since I took the screenshot. I'm not redoing the math.]</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.patrickrothfuss.com/blog/uploaded_images/Me,-wheton,-Felicia-705646.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 291px;" src="http://www.patrickrothfuss.com/blog/uploaded_images/Me,-wheton,-Felicia-705643.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 85%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">(Click to Embiggen)</span></span></div>
<p>As a side note, you can see that according to Goodreads, I&#8217;m ever-so slightly cooler than Wil Wheaton. I like how it looks like his little Lego man is pissed at me for being above him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Curse you, Rothfuss,&#8221; Lego-Wheaton says. &#8220;How dare you get between me and Felicia day?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Takest not that tone with me,&#8221; Russian-dictator-looking-Rothfuss glowers from above. &#8220;Lest I crush you with my manly, blue-lit beard.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Bring it Hagrid,&#8221; he replies. &#8220;I&#8217;ll beat you like a redheaded stepchild.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What are you going to use?&#8221; I say. &#8220;Your kung-fu grip? Hell, you don&#8217;t even have any elbows!&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait&#8230; Sorry, what was I talking about again?</p>
<p>Oh. Right. Coolness. I guess I lost a few points just there.</p>
<p>Anyway, as you can see things stand like this:</p>
<p>Me: 383 friends, 308 people following my reviews.</p>
<p>Felicia: 2,710 friends, 380 people following her reviews.</p>
<p>Not pictured above, Neil Gaiman sits at #1 on this list. Topping the chart on a mountain of cool with 5,175 friends and 3,133 people following his reviews.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just combine these for simplicity&#8217;s sake:</p>
<p>Gaiman: 8308</p>
<p>Felicia: 3090</p>
<p>Me: 691</p>
<p>Because the Facebook numbers are really high compared to Goodreads, we have to normalize them by multiplying by .045. (Don&#8217;t ask how I got there. It&#8217;s boring. If you understand statistics, you know how it works.) That gives us:</p>
<p>Gaiman: 4050</p>
<p>Felicia: 8550</p>
<p>Me: 450</p>
<p>So we add these together and apply the bonus multipliers.</p>
<p>Gaimain:<br />
Medium Bonus &#8211; Novels, Comics, Movies, Audiobooks: *1.4</p>
<p>Association Bonus &#8211; Engaged to Amanda Palmer *1.5</p>
<p>Flair Bonus &#8211; Accent *1.4</p>
<p>Appearance Bonus: Sexy *1.5</p>
<p>12358 *1.4 *1.5 *1.4 *1.5 = <span style="font-weight: bold;">54499</span></p>
<p>Felicia:<br />
Medium Bonus &#8211; Television, Webisodes, Comics: *1.3<br />
(<a href="http://www.wow.com/2009/12/22/the-guild-comic-available-for-pre-order/">The Guild comic</a> is coming out soon, in case you didn&#8217;t know.)</p>
<p>Association Bonus &#8211; Works with Joss Whedon *1.6</p>
<p>Flair Bonus &#8211; Smells like flowers and PS3 *1.3</p>
<p>Appearance Bonus: Sexy *1.5</p>
<p>11640 *1.3 *1.6 *1.2 *1.5 = <span style="font-weight: bold;">47212</span></p>
<p>Me:<br />
Flair Bonus: Beard *1.2</p>
<p>Penalty: Engaging in imaginary smack talk with Lego-Wheaton. *.09</p>
<p>1141 *1.2 *0.9 = <span style="font-weight: bold;">1232</span></p>
<p>You still with me? Now we have to create our yardstick for the measurement of geek-coolness. Imagine if Neil Gaiman and Felicia Day were somehow alchemically combined into one creature. Some ubercool, sexy, hermaphroditic, webisode-creating, rockstar, gamer, author thing.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say that godlike creature would be the ultimate amalgam of geek cool.</p>
<p>So if we add together the scores of Neil Gaiman and Felicia Day, we get roughly 100,000 units. These I hereby term Gaiman-Day units. They will hereafter be used to determine how cool someone is. 100,000 Gaiman-Day units is the coolest you can be without collapsing into some manner of singularity.</p>
<p>So there we go. Now we have a way to quantify how cool I am, Jake. I am exactly 1232 Gaiman-Day units of cool. Only about one percent as cool as it&#8217;s possible to be.</p>
<p>I hope this answers your question, Jake.</p>
<p>pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2010/01/fanmail-q-coolness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Various and Sundry things.</title>
		<link>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2008/12/various-and-sundry-things/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2008/12/various-and-sundry-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Goodreads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hodgelany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple days after watching Prince Caspian and going all frothy about it, I watched Wall-E.
Pixar never fails to amaze me. I can&#8217;t help but wonder how, as a team, they manage  continuous brilliance. Well&#8230; to be fair, Cars was merely great. But other than that, everything they do is just a different flavor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple days after watching Prince Caspian and <a href="http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2008/12/on-hollywood-narnia-and-nature-of/">going all frothy about it</a>, I watched Wall-E.</p>
<p>Pixar never fails to amaze me. I can&#8217;t help but wonder how, as a team, they manage  continuous brilliance. Well&#8230; to be fair, Cars was merely great. But other than that, everything they do is just a different flavor of incredible. Constantly manufacturing a <span style="font-style: italic;">good</span> creative product is hard enough. But constant excellence produced by a changing team. That&#8217;s nigh-impossible.</p>
<p>Frankly, I expect some manner of pact with dark powers.</p>
<p>Or, more likely, Pixar has something like cull-the-heard Wednesdays. Where once a week someone quietly wanders through the office and has a close look at everyone. Susan is doodling a palindromic sestina on her napkin at lunch &#8211; Check. Terry is spontaneously reciting pi to a song of her own creation while using the Xerox machine &#8211; Check. Dave is humming the theme song from &#8220;Land of the Lost&#8221; while sending out zombie invitations on Facebook&#8230;.</p>
<p>On Thursday, when the other workers ask why Dave&#8217;s desk is empty, management explains that they transferred him to a nice animation studio out in the country where he&#8217;ll have plenty of room to run and play.</p>
<p>So&#8230; yeah. Suffice to say that if Pixar wanted the rights to make a movie of the book, they wouldn&#8217;t have to fight very hard.</p>
<p>Sarah and I have almost managed to put the fundraiser to bed. Tomorrow should be our last busy day. After it&#8217;s all done, I&#8217;ll post up some pictures, give the final donations totals, and talk about our plans for the future.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">I won&#8217;t be posting up a list of winners and their prizes</span> because that would involve me putting folks&#8217; personal information up on the web without their permission, and that isn&#8217;t cool.</p>
<p>Also, I didn&#8217;t e-mail everyone who won, because it would have taken WAY too long. So you might have won something even if you haven&#8217;t heard from me. But don&#8217;t e-mail me and ask about it. Seriously.</p>
<p>In other news, I&#8217;m on <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/108424.Patrick_Rothfuss"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Goodreads</span></a> now. I&#8217;m not planning on spending a huge amount of time there, but you can add me as a friend if you&#8217;re into that sort of thing.</p>
<p>And lastly, could some tech-savvy person out there do me a bit of a favor? Namely, could you change <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Rothfuss">my Wikipedia picture</a>, preferably to one that makes me look slightly <span style="font-style: italic;">less</span> like a serial killer?</p>
<p>I appreciate that someone went through the trouble of uploading a photo. And I don&#8217;t deny that it&#8217;s a fairly accurate depiction of how I look most of the time. But still, if there is going to be a picture of me, I&#8217;d rather it not look like something that was pulled from a pamphlet titled &#8220;How to Spot a Sociopath.&#8221;</p>
<p>Later all,</p>
<p>pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2008/12/various-and-sundry-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

